It is quite possible that the whole thing is well-known anyway. For instance, I have seen in an Estonian knitting book such a pattern where one stitch is in stockinette and the next is a patent stitch. I have never knittid this but the fabric did not seem very textured in the picture. But let us look at this now.
On the first glance looks like half-patent (p1, yo, slip next stitch, in wrong side row k 1 and p patent st together with yo). But this is not the case. Please observe the wrong side.
This is something that reminds of so-called broken rib stitch. This is done as follows: in the first row, k across, back row k1, p1. In my case it is almost the same: in the right side row, k1, yo, s1, wrong side k1, p patent stitch together with yo. Looks nice on both sides.
2 kommentaari:
Peab ära proovima. Kujutan ette, et mingi peenikese karvase lõnga lisamisega peaks päris uhke ruumiline kude saama.
Inga, jah, kindlasti tuleb proovida. Kude ei ole nii kohev ja mahuline, nagu tavaline patent või poolpatent, siiski piisavalt markantne. Pakun, et patent või poolpatent on mahuline sellepärast, et kontrast pinna suhtest tõstetud patentsilmuse ja pahempidise vahel on suur (pahempidine tekitab vao ja täispatendi puhul on see vahe veelgi suurem). Antud juhul rips tasandab pisut. Võiks proovida ka nii, et nt 2 silmust ripsis ja 1 patentsilmus. Ka hea salli/rätiku kude.
Postita kommentaar